If the ordinance goes into effect, it would represent a groundbreaking use of the 2009 law, which so far has received little scrutiny in court. Ten years ago, the US Supreme Court struck down a Massachusetts cigarette advertising ban that was designed to restrict ads near schools but was judged by the high court as being too broad.
Worcester may be the first city in the nation to test the strength of the federal 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and buy cigarettes Control Act, which allows states and localities to use health concerns over smoking cigarettes to impose “specific bans or restrictions on the time, place, and manner’’ of cigarette advertising. The Worcester City Council voted this spring to ban discount cigarettes brand advertising visible from streets, parks, and schools. Down would come all those Marlboro, Camel, and Newport ads seductively promising pleasure and status, ads that have turned corner storefronts into the most vile form of urban graffiti. Stores would be allowed to note that they sell cigarettes, but that is all.
Worcester’s advertising ordinance was to go into effect this week. But given the precedent it would set, Philip Morris USA, R.J. Reynolds, Lorillard, and the National Association of cigarettes Outlets filed suit in federal court to kill the ordinance in the name of free speech. The city agreed to a stay pending a hearing, confident it can prevail in the name of public health.
“About five people a week die in Worcester from cigarettes, compared to a total of 42 people in all of 2009 who died in car crashes in all of Worcester County,’’ Worcester city solicitor David Moore said in an interview. “If we were talking about five people dying a week from pharmaceuticals, no one would say government doesn’t have some kind of role in trying to regulate.’’
Moore likened the ordinance to speed limits on our roadways. Worcester certainly needs a speed bump on cigarettes, because 1 of every 4 residents smokes, compared with 1 in 6 in Massachusetts.
“Actually, this is a relatively mild step,’’ he said. “We’re not banning smoking cigarettes or the sale of cigarettes. But we read the federal law to say that when there is a substantial public interest and smoking cigarettes is very substantial, a city is allowed leeway. We’re not banning advertising just because we don’t like the smell of cheap cigarettes on our clothes. We’re doing it because cheap cigarettes are a fatal product.’’
The best part about this law is that it was inspired by the very targets of cigarette advertising. For several years, teenagers in the HOPE Coalition — the initials stand for Healthy Options for Prevention and Education — have tried to educate peers and politicians about the tragedy of smoking cigarettes. In 2006, the coalition began documenting, through photos and a computerized mapping system, which stores in the city sold cigarettes. The result was visual proof that storefront cigarette advertising was concentrated in low-income communities of color.
HOPE advisor Laurie Ross, a professor of community development and planning at Clark University, says that, because of students’ indignation over the findings, “the kids went on a campaign that just didn’t stop.’’
The teens were so determined, they kept bringing their complaints to the council, even though federal law seemed stacked against local efforts to ban storefront advertising. They kept up their efforts until Moore realized that the 2009 act finally gave the city powers on advertising.
“They really did a great job at getting our attention,’’ Moore said. “They would come to council meetings with ‘Rest In Peace’ tombstone signs saying how many people die from cigarettes.’’
These youths, in an inspiring act of democracy, not only got Worcester’s attention, but that of the entire cigarette industry as well. We will soon know if the 2009 act was truly meant to protect teens — or if it lets Big cigarettes online continue to peddle death at every storefront, as America’s most insidious graffiti artist.
Other cigarettes news and tobacco market events you can find at links bellow:
• Best-Buy-Cigarettes.Com Tobacco News
• CigarettesPro.com Tobacco News
• Discount-Cigarettes-Planet.Com Cigarettes News
Newsletter
|
Payment
|
Tell A Friend
|
What is your favorite way to buy cigarettes
The Fourth District Court of Appeal has upheld an injunction barring the sale of discount cigarette online by stores operating on lands held in trust in eastern Riverside County for the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, to non-Indians.Div. Two, in a July 13 decision ordered published yesterday, concluded the government was likely to prevail on its claims that Black Hawk cigarettes store Inc., and its proprietor Frederick Allen McAllister, were engaged in unlawful business practices in the operations of its four stores in Palm Springs and Cathedral City.In the government’s complaint,...
The Los Angeles County Department of Public Health announced Wednesday that multi-unit housing can expose hazardous secondhand smoke cigarettes to non-smokers living adjacent to those who do smoke.Since 2006, secondhand smoke cigarettes has been classified by the California Air Resources Board as a "toxic air contaminant" that can lead to death, serious illnesse, and a overall health hazards.Research shows that residents could be exposed to dangerous levels of smoke cigarettes through cracks in fixtures, electrical outlets, pipes, vents and baseboards, as well as shared venitlation...
A new statewide push aims to protect non-smokers from the dangers of secondhand smoke, meaning smokers could be told not to light up in their own apartments.The voluntary initiative, led by the Florida Department of Health's cigarettes online Free Florida Program, will help those interested in making multi-unit housing smoke-free get started. According to its website, secondhand smoke cigarettes can travel from one apartment to another. In fact, the DOH says "secondhand smoke cigarettes can seep through lighting fixtures, cracks in walls, around plumbing, under doors, through shared...
From a health standpoint, there’s a lot to be said for banning smoking cigarettes from the Montana State University campus. But the blanket ban on cigarettes store use adopted by campus leaders earlier this month seems a bit much.Protecting nonsmokers from secondhand smoke cigarettes is certainly a good thing, and measures to ensure that happens are justifiable. But a ban on all use of discount cigarettes on the 1,400-acre-plus MSU campus – including smokeless discount cigarette online and online cigarettes use in individuals’ private vehicles – doesn’t seem necessary to...
King County's overall retailer compliance rate has also dropped — from 96 percent in 2009 to less than 89 percent in the 999 inspections done so far this year.The ongoing stings, conducted year-round by Public Health — Seattle & King County, involve a group of teenagers, aged 15 to 17 ½, who try to buy cigarette products from retailers. They don't lie about their ages if asked, and they use real I.D.s."We're not trying to trick retailers," said Scott Neal, cigarettes-prevention program manager.The retailers cited for selling to underage teens were:• Vashon Market, 17639 100th S.W....