We join many Texans in supporting legislation that would ban smoking cigarettes statewide in workplace environments and indoor public places where people gather. In the past, we've supported such a statewide ban for health reasons. The health risks associated with secondhand smoke cigarettes are real and harmful, especially to children and to adults with asthma or heart disease.
Medical experts tell us that there are no safe levels of exposure to secondhand smoke cigarettes for any person, so it makes sense to remove that risk from the job and places where people regularly socialize, such as restaurants and bars.
But now more than ever it makes economic sense. A fiscal note in House Bill 670 by state Rep. Myra Crownover, R-Denton, indicates the ban would save $31 million in health care costs to Texas.
That is no small matter at a time when the Legislature is looking for every dime to help fill a projected $27 billion spending gap. That shortfall represents the difference between projected revenue over the next two years and the amount the state needs to finance current services and growth.
To balance the budget without raising taxes, the Legislature is contemplating massive cuts to public and higher education and health and human services.
In the Texas Senate, Rodney Ellis, D-Houston, has again authored a similar bill, Senate Bill 355, to ban smoking cigarettes in the workplace and other indoor public places, so the effort is bipartisan. The House bill has attracted 81 co-authors from both parties, and six state senators have signed on, too. A statewide ban on smoking cigarettes in indoor public places is popular with Texans: A recent poll by Baselice & Associates indicates that 70 percent of Texas voters support such a ban.
Texans should not be fooled by those who say a statewide ban amounts to governmental intrusion on a business' property rights or an individual's right to smoke cigarettes where he or she wants.
Smoking is legal. And there is nothing in the pair of bills making their way through the Legislature that would outlaw smoking cigarettes. The bills simply would prohibit smoking cigarettes in indoor public places and on the job. It would not prevent smokers from lighting up in their homes, cigarettes shops or outdoor areas, including patios of a restaurant or bar.
The Constitution does not guarantee that a person has a right to smoke cigarettes in the workplace or in a restaurant. And a smoker's right to light up must be balanced against the rights of people to work and socialize in smoke-free environments, given the health hazards of secondhand smoke.
Secondhand smoke cigarettes is classified as a known carcinogen that is blamed for the deaths of nearly 50,000 nonsmokers in the United States who die each year from heart disease or lung cancer.
Pregnant women exposed to secondhand smoke cigarettes are at an increased risk of having low-birth-weight babies. And secondhand smoke cigarettes has been linked to many other diseases, such as bronchitis and pneumonia, which result in thousands of hospitalizations annually, according to the American Cancer Society. Many of those who fall ill from secondhand smoke cigarettes are exposed to it in their homes. But, as we've noted, there are no safe levels of exposure.
Numerous cities — including Austin — have reacted to those cautions by enacting smoking cigarettes bans for indoor public places. But many Texas cities and unincorporated areas don't have such protections. That is why the Legislature should finally pass the legislation. The health benefits are reason enough. But the savings in health care costs add additional heft to the cause.
A law that creates smoke-free environments on the job and in indoor public spots finally would balance the rights and concerns of both smokers and nonsmokers. And that is fair to all Texans.
Other cigarettes news and tobacco market events you can find at links bellow:
• Cigarettes & Tobacco News
• CigarettesPro.com Tobacco News
• Discount Cigarettes Tobacco News
Newsletter
|
Payment
|
Tell A Friend
|
What is your favorite way to buy cigarettes
The Fourth District Court of Appeal has upheld an injunction barring the sale of discount cigarette online by stores operating on lands held in trust in eastern Riverside County for the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, to non-Indians.Div. Two, in a July 13 decision ordered published yesterday, concluded the government was likely to prevail on its claims that Black Hawk cigarettes store Inc., and its proprietor Frederick Allen McAllister, were engaged in unlawful business practices in the operations of its four stores in Palm Springs and Cathedral City.In the government’s complaint,...
The Los Angeles County Department of Public Health announced Wednesday that multi-unit housing can expose hazardous secondhand smoke cigarettes to non-smokers living adjacent to those who do smoke.Since 2006, secondhand smoke cigarettes has been classified by the California Air Resources Board as a "toxic air contaminant" that can lead to death, serious illnesse, and a overall health hazards.Research shows that residents could be exposed to dangerous levels of smoke cigarettes through cracks in fixtures, electrical outlets, pipes, vents and baseboards, as well as shared venitlation...
A new statewide push aims to protect non-smokers from the dangers of secondhand smoke, meaning smokers could be told not to light up in their own apartments.The voluntary initiative, led by the Florida Department of Health's cigarettes online Free Florida Program, will help those interested in making multi-unit housing smoke-free get started. According to its website, secondhand smoke cigarettes can travel from one apartment to another. In fact, the DOH says "secondhand smoke cigarettes can seep through lighting fixtures, cracks in walls, around plumbing, under doors, through shared...
From a health standpoint, there’s a lot to be said for banning smoking cigarettes from the Montana State University campus. But the blanket ban on cigarettes store use adopted by campus leaders earlier this month seems a bit much.Protecting nonsmokers from secondhand smoke cigarettes is certainly a good thing, and measures to ensure that happens are justifiable. But a ban on all use of discount cigarettes on the 1,400-acre-plus MSU campus – including smokeless discount cigarette online and online cigarettes use in individuals’ private vehicles – doesn’t seem necessary to...
King County's overall retailer compliance rate has also dropped — from 96 percent in 2009 to less than 89 percent in the 999 inspections done so far this year.The ongoing stings, conducted year-round by Public Health — Seattle & King County, involve a group of teenagers, aged 15 to 17 ½, who try to buy cigarette products from retailers. They don't lie about their ages if asked, and they use real I.D.s."We're not trying to trick retailers," said Scott Neal, cigarettes-prevention program manager.The retailers cited for selling to underage teens were:• Vashon Market, 17639 100th S.W....